<|endoftext|> school , who did not want to be named, said: ��I have a problem because they all have winter coats at home. At that age they are quite particular about what they wear or what is comfortable for them.
��Most children already have their own winter coats and clearly they��re not going to where a school coat out of school hours.
��I��m a complete supporter of school uniform policy, and I could understand if they were banning branded trousers, handbags or earrings, but the coat ban is ridiculous.
��If you go to the school at 2.50pm when they leave school, 90 percent of the kids are not wearing a coat and it is freezing.
��I sympathise with making sure everyone feels equal in school but they are still coming in £100 trainers. Coats generally aren��t branded. I know my children wouldn��t care about a North Face jacket, they probably are more likely to buy one from Primark.��
A padded coat from the school��s approved retailer costs £32. The least expensive coat, a ��lightweight�� rain coat, costs £14.90.
When The Argus visited the school in Ladies Mile Road as pupils were leaving school around 3pm, dozens of students could be seen without coats shaking in the cold with frozen fingers and covering their heads with scarves, as it rained hard and temperatures reached as low as two degrees in Patcham yesterday.
But headteacher John McKee defended the school coats policy which started in September. He said students could wear their own coats walking to school, just not past the school gates.
He said he was dumbfounded how parents could send their children to school without wearing a coat.
Speaking to The Argus he said: ��They are allowed to wear their coats to school, it is only when they are on the school grounds that they need to put their school coat on. If they choose to wear a non-school coat, they can put that in their bags when they arrive.
��The reason we like them to wear the school coats is because of equality. We are trying to make the school uniform equitable, we don��t want disadvantaged children to feel they cannot wear any coat in and around school because it isn��t a designer label. It is something Ofsted were quite happy with.
��I��ve spoken to lots of parents and they have been quite supportive about it. But there are a few that don��t want to buy the coat, which is fine, it just means losing an option for their child within the school grounds to wear a coat.
��I certainly would send my child to school in a coat . I think a lot of parents would say ��don��t leave the house without a coat on��.
��It has always been a rule at school, they just now have an option for something else. We talked about it at a governors�� meeting and they will write to people to further endorse it to make sure parents understand why we are doing it.��
Mr McKee added parents could pay for the coats in instalments and there was funding for the most disadvantaged pupils, if they could not afford the coats.<|endoftext|>Posted by
Ian McClurg ,
December 11, 2014 Email
Ian McClurg
Twitter
@1v1SoccerFC Read this on your iPhone/iPad or Android device
There is little doubt that the modern game is going through a period of unprecedented tactical flexibility. Coaches at the top levels are frequently changing tactical structures multiple times during games. As a result, the modern player is expected to be capable of playing multiple roles - not only during the course of a season, but within each 90 minute game. Bayern Munich is a prime example of this. Pep Guardiola frequently requires that players such as Phillip Lahm play as many as three different positions during one game – defensive midfield pivot, attacking midfield and even full-back. This trend in the modern game has an impact on how youth coaches should be preparing younger players for the future. To be capable of succeeding at the higher levels of the game, young players will have to gain experience at playing multiple positions and to be mentally flexible to embrace change. One of the challenges we face in North America is our tendency to place young players in specific positions at young ages. Typically coaches will place children in positions based on physical size, level of aggression, speed and technical ability. Less skilled players are asked to play as defenders, aggressive players are asked to play midfield and fast and skillful players are selected as forwards. The problem with this is that coaches are typically making these decisions to win games, not to develop players. Rarely do youth coaches allow young players to change positions, and parents and the players themselves start to believe that they can